The work of reversing President Obama’s regulatory overreach continues.
The Trump administration announced it will repeal the Waters of the United States (WOTUS) rule, The Wall Street Journal reports:
The rule expanded the definition of federally-regulated waters so broadly that ditches, canals, collection ponds, and isolated wetlands far from “navigable waters” were covered. In order to build or make modifications on their land, farmers, ranchers, and businesses would need to hire consultants and lawyers to get costly federal permits.
Good thing WOTUS is tied up in federal court and not being enforced.
William Kovacs, U.S. Chamber senior vice president of Environment, Technology, & Regulatory Affairs, welcomed the decision:
EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt vowed to craft a new regulation “in a way that is thoughtful, transparent and collaborative with other agencies and the public.”
The WOTUS fiasco reminds us how broken the federal regulatory process is. So much wasted time and energy could have been avoided if we had a more modern way of crafting regulations, like the Regulatory Accountability Act (RAA).
If the RAA were law, small businesses, local governments, and other affected parties could make EPA defend its rationale for WOTUS and the economic and scientific analysis supporting it before it had the force of law. The RAA would result in higher-quality rules, more tailored to fixing the problems they’re intended to solve.
Senators who want real, substantial regulatory reform that avoids overbearing rules like WOTUS should support the RAA.
About the authors
Sean Hackbarth
Sean writes about public policies affecting businesses including energy, health care, and regulations. When not battling those making it harder for free enterprise to succeed, he raves about all things Wisconsin (his home state) and religiously follows the Green Bay Packers.