Forum
California Supreme Court
Case Status
Decided
Docket Number
Oral Argument Date
February 06, 2018
Case Updates
California Supreme Court issues decision adopting new test for independent contractor status
April 30, 2018
The California Supreme Court issued a decision that could make it substantially more difficult for businesses in California to show that their workers are independent contractors rather than employees. The court adopted a new version of the so-called “ABC” test for purposes of claims brought under California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) Wage Orders. Under that test, a worker is an independent contractor rather than an employee only if he or she meets the following three factors:
- the worker is free from the control and direction of the hirer in connection with the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact; and
- the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and
- the worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation, or business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.
U.S. Chamber files supplemental brief in opposition to narrowing the standard for classifying independent contractors under California law
January 17, 2018
Click here to view the amicus letter filed by the U.S. Chamber and California Chamber of Commerce.
John A. Taylor, Jr., Jeremy B. Rosen, and Felix Shafir of Horvitz & Levy LLP served as co-counsel for the Chambers.
U.S. Chamber files supplemental brief
January 20, 2017
Click here to view the supplemental brief filed by the U.S. Chamber and California Chamber of Commerce.
John A. Taylor, Jr., Jeremy B. Rosen, and Felix Shafir of Horvitz & Levy LLP served as co-counsel for the Chambers.
U.S. Chamber urges California Supreme Court to reject use of wage order test in determining employment status
December 04, 2015
In its brief, the U.S. Chamber urged the California Supreme Court to overturn a lower court’s decision that improperly applied the “suffer and permit” test drawn from Industrial Welfare Commission wage orders to determine liability when workers challenge their independent contractor status.
The brief filed jointly with the California Chamber of Commerce also encourages the court to consider harmonization of wage order tests with Borello’s common law test when determining employment status and stresses that the “right to control” is the determinative consideration regardless of which test is applied.
John A. Taylor, Jr., Jeremy B. Rosen, Felix Shafir, and David W. Moreshead of Horvitz & Levy LLP served as co-counsel for the amici.
Case Documents
- Opinion Granting Petition in Part -- Dynamex v. Superior Court (California Court of Appeal).pdf
- U.S. Chamber Amicus Brief -- Dynamex v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court).pdf
- U.S. Chamber Supplemental Brief -- Dynamex v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court).pdf
- Petitioner's Letter Brief -- Dynamex v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court).pdf
- U.S. Chamber Supplemental Letter Brief -- Dynamex v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court).pdf
- California Employment Law Council Supplemental Letter Brief -- Dynamex v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court).pdf
- Opinion Dynamexv Superior Court California Supreme Court
- Petition for Rehearing -- Dynamex v. Superior Court (California Supreme Court).pdf