Forum
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Case Status
Docket Number
Case Updates
District court dismisses PhRMA’s challenge to Minnesota law requiring manufacturers to provide insulin without compensation
March 15, 2021
The court reasoned that PhRMA cannot seek equitable relief under the Takings Clause because adequate state-law compensation remedies are available. The U.S. Chamber filed a coalition amicus brief supporting PhRMA.
U.S. Chamber files coalition amicus brief in support of challenge to Minnesota law that violates the Takings Clause by requiring manufacturers to provide insulin without compensation
October 05, 2020
Click here to view the amicus brief filed by the U.S. Chamber and the National Association of Manufacturers. Jeremy C. Marwell of Vinson & Elkins LLP, along with Thomas H. Boyd and David A. Aafedt of Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., served as co-counsel for the coalition.
Case Documents
- Complaint -- PhRMA v. Williams (D. Minn.).pdf
- U.S. Chamber and NAM Amicus Brief -- PhRMA v. Williams (D. Minn.).pdf
- Opinion and Order -- PhRMA v. Williams (D. Minn.).pdf