Forum
U.S. Supreme Court
Case Status
Decided
Docket Number
Term
2020 Term
Lower Court Opinion
Questions Presented
Whether the uncompensated appropriation of an easement that is limited in time effects a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment.
Case Updates
U.S. Supreme Court holds that government appropriation of an easement on employer property constitutes a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment
June 23, 2021
Click here to view the opinion.
U.S. Chamber files amicus brief in U.S. Supreme Court, arguing that government appropriation of an easement on employer property constitutes a per se physical taking under the Fifth Amendment
January 07, 2021
Click here to view the Chamber’s amicus brief. Steffen N. Johnson and the U.S. Chamber’s Litigation Center served as co-counsel for the U.S. Chamber.
Case Documents
- Ninth Circuit Opinion - Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma (Ninth Circuit).pdf
- Ninth Circuit Order Denying Rehearing -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Shiroma (Ninth Circuit).pdf
- Cert. Petition -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf
- U.S. Chamber Amicus Brief -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf
- Petitioners' Brief on the Merits -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf
- Brief for the Solicitor General -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf
- Brief for Respondents -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf
- Opinion -- Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid (U.S. Supreme Court).pdf