Forum

California Supreme Court

Case Status

Decided

Docket Number

A116816 & A117648

Share

Case Updates

California appeals court rejects post sale duty to warn of hazards created by combining asbestos with manufacturer’s product

February 25, 2009

A California appeals court held that the defendant-manufacturer could not be held liable for failing to warn about asbestos added to its product after it had been sold.

U.S. Chamber files amicus brief

January 22, 2008

NCLC urged the California Court of Appeal to refuse to hold liable a product manufacturer for failing to warn about hazardous products used by others in combination with its products. Here, the trial court properly held that the defendant-manufacturer could not be held liable for failing to warn about the asbestos put on the product post-sale by the Navy. If a broad duty were upheld, it would not only expand asbestos liability but could expand the duty to warn for others as well.

Case Documents

Search