Fighting Big Labor’s Agenda at the NLRB
The National Labor Relations Act calls for a balance between the interests of unions and business and for the NLRB to act as a neutral party in resolving disputes. Unfortunately, dramatic policy shifts threaten both workers and employers and will undermine the NLRB’s ability to act as an impartial agency.
Latest
Featured story
A group of Amazon workers represented by the Amazon Labor Union filed a lawsuit against union leaders for alleged anti-democratic practices.
Feature story
While the Teamsters’ strike ostensibly is about working conditions at the facility, the reality is that the union is angry that “Amazon has refused to recognize and honor the union contract” that a different company agreed to.
Latest Content
The White House on May 26 announced that the President intended to nominate Gwynne Wilcox to fill the lone vacancy on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which currently has a 3-1 Republican majority.
The United States Senate on July 29 confirmed two nominees for the National Labor Relations Board.
The National Labor Relations Board today reversed an Obama-era Board's policy that protected profanity and abusive conduct.
The federal D.C. District Court issued an order upholding most of the NLRB's election procedures rule.
For the last couple of years, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has been chipping away at the dubious legacy of the Obama-era Board—a legacy that by one count overturned 4,559 cumulative years of precedence and produced numerous decisions tilted heav
The U.S.
A group of 20 prominent labor attorneys on April 20 submitted a letter to the NLRB formally requesting that that it suspend elections.
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) on April 1 released its final rule implementing changes to its representation election procedures.
In non-Coronavirus related news, the AFL-CIO on March 6 filed a lawsuit against the NLRB seeking to overturn its election procedures rule.
The National Labor Relations Board will soon be heading to federal court in an attempt to nullify Oregon's so-called “captive audience” law.
